<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AD Summation users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://summationusers.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://summationusers.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LAC Group, CCM Merge Information Management With Cost Reduction</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541643642</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541643642#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541643642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/handshake75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	LAC Group, a Los Angeles-based information services provider, has announced its merger with Chase Cost Management, a New York firm that specializes in cost-based management.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/handshake75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	LAC Group, a Los Angeles-based information services provider, has announced its merger with Chase Cost Management, a New York firm that specializes in cost-based management.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541643642/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cranking Up the Buzz on Info-Governance, Predictive Coding</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541708083</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541708083#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Snow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541708083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/buzz_bubble_75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Two of the hottest topics at ALM's recent LegalTech New York conference -- information governance and predictive coding, and concerns over when and how practitioners can and should deal with them -- are further amplified by results of a small survey Symantec Corporation conducted at the show. The two topics are proving to be major buzzwords for 2012, and for good reason. They're complex and intimidating, in part because of the risks and expenses associated with them, and in part because of the understandable angst felt by many in the legal industry over being early ... [MORE]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/buzz_bubble_75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Two of the hottest topics at ALM's recent LegalTech New York conference -- information governance and predictive coding, and concerns over when and how practitioners can and should deal with them -- are further amplified by results of a small survey Symantec Corporation conducted at the show. The two topics are proving to be major buzzwords for 2012, and for good reason. They're complex and intimidating, in part because of the risks and expenses associated with them, and in part because of the understandable angst felt by many in the legal industry over being early ... [MORE]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541708083/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble With Keeping Legacy Data Around</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541738741</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541738741#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anne Kershaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541738741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/cd_pile75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Legacy data when kept indefinitely has no value or purpose. But Anne Kershaw, of the eDiscovery Institute, notes it can create expensive havoc and costs that can be avoided if properly managed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/cd_pile75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Legacy data when kept indefinitely has no value or purpose. But Anne Kershaw, of the eDiscovery Institute, notes it can create expensive havoc and costs that can be avoided if properly managed.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541738741/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must Parent and Attachment Files Be Kept Together?</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541610355</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541610355#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas J. Smith and Matthew S. Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541610355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/parent_separation75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Thomas J. Smith and Matthew S. Collins, of K&#38;LGates, advise that parties are best served by addressing the issue of parent and attachment separation early in the discovery process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/parent_separation75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Thomas J. Smith and Matthew S. Collins, of K&LGates, advise that parties are best served by addressing the issue of parent and attachment separation early in the discovery process.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541610355/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The View From the Bench: Opinions on E-Discovery in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202539653137</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202539653137#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cecil Lynn III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202539653137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/0112ltnp75.gif" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Littler Mendelson's Cecil Lynn III writes that 2011 witnessed the democratization of e-discovery as case law evolved past the humble pronouncements of a few tech-savvy federal judges.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/0112ltnp75.gif" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Littler Mendelson's Cecil Lynn III writes that 2011 witnessed the democratization of e-discovery as case law evolved past the humble pronouncements of a few tech-savvy federal judges.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202539653137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8216;Accidental&#8217; Project Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541542794</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541542794#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brett Burney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541542794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/images/75_pics/burney_brett1.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="Brett Burney" />
	In "10 Steps to Manage E-Discovery Projects," Steven C. Bennett and Marla S.K. Bergman suggest that "lawyers involved in e-discovery must become project managers." I don't quite agree, says consultant Brett Burney. Lawyers are better suited as "process managers," dictating the vision and goals of the project. Lawyers should not be the "project managers" who focus on the minutiae of the day-to-day e-discovery tasks. If anything, the lawyer is often a de facto or "accidental" project manager, because the law firm may refuse to admit they need another ... [MORE]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/images/75_pics/burney_brett1.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="Brett Burney" />
	In "10 Steps to Manage E-Discovery Projects," Steven C. Bennett and Marla S.K. Bergman suggest that "lawyers involved in e-discovery must become project managers." I don't quite agree, says consultant Brett Burney. Lawyers are better suited as "process managers," dictating the vision and goals of the project. Lawyers should not be the "project managers" who focus on the minutiae of the day-to-day e-discovery tasks. If anything, the lawyer is often a de facto or "accidental" project manager, because the law firm may refuse to admit they need another ... [MORE]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541542794/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feb. 8, 2012: Product News Briefs</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541626438</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541626438#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Legal Technology News And Updates - Law Technology News</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541626438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/directory_update75.gif" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Here are this week's latest legal tech industry developments, together in one convenient list. Included this week are news updates from BIA, Integreon, Ipro Tech, LiveDeposition, Nextpoint, OrcaTec, PureDiscovery, and Thomson Reuters' WestLawNext.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/directory_update75.gif" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Here are this week's latest legal tech industry developments, together in one convenient list. Included this week are news updates from BIA, Integreon, Ipro Tech, LiveDeposition, Nextpoint, OrcaTec, PureDiscovery, and Thomson Reuters' WestLawNext.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541626438/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Potential Traps of Cloud Computing</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541595939</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541595939#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Cahn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541595939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/computer_trap75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Should your company be taking greater advantage of the benefits of cloud computing? The promise sounds enticing, but Kilpatrick Townsend's Timothy Cahn warns there are risks involved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/computer_trap75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Should your company be taking greater advantage of the benefits of cloud computing? The promise sounds enticing, but Kilpatrick Townsend's Timothy Cahn warns there are risks involved.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541595939/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of an E-Discovery Project</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541636600</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541636600#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brett Burney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541636600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/images/75_pics/burney_brett1.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="Brett Burney" />
	In a previous article, consultant Brett Burney asserted that lawyers are not project managers. In fact, Burney continues, lawyers would find the anatomy of a project alien to their education and experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/images/75_pics/burney_brett1.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="Brett Burney" />
	In a previous article, consultant Brett Burney asserted that lawyers are not project managers. In fact, Burney continues, lawyers would find the anatomy of a project alien to their education and experience.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541636600/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidance Buys CaseCentral to Make End-to-End E-Discovery Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541437749</link>
		<comments>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541437749#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Doherty and Brendan McKenna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct summation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summation training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1202541437749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/guidance_software75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Guidance Software, a computer forensics and e-discovery software provider, announced Tuesday the acquisition of CaseCentral, which provides hosted, aka cloud-based, e-discovery review software and services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[

		<img src="http://www.law.com/image/ltn/75_pics/guidance_software75.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="" />
	Guidance Software, a computer forensics and e-discovery software provider, announced Tuesday the acquisition of CaseCentral, which provides hosted, aka cloud-based, e-discovery review software and services.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202541437749/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

